top of page
EMF Towers

It is well known and accepted that ionizing radiation can cause illness. More scientists from various academic fields are now speaking up about the deleterious physiological effects of non-ionizing radiation, which includes radiation created by electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs). Electromagnetism is the foundation and basis of life. Our body relies on fine-tuned electrical reactions that transmit and process information. The omnipresent manmade EMFs in our lives is increasing drastically every year and is causing harm to us and our environment. For more background information about electromagnetic fields and EMF pollution, please read our webpage here [1].

Where Do They Come From?

What Are EMF Towers?

​

EMF towers - also known as cell towers and base stations - are a catch-all term for various structures that physically support antennas and EMF communication signaling devices. These towers support a broad spectrum of communication systems, including for cell phones, TV broadcasting, FM radio broadcasting, aeronautical and maritime radionavigation, fixed satellites, and space and military use. Each of these communication systems employ a specific portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (EMS), called a bandwidth. Communication service providers bid and buy specific radiofrequency bandwidths, usually ranging from 3KHz to 300GHz. For this radio spectrum alone, the number of allocated bandwidths in the USA is tremendous [8]. 

​

EMF towers themselves are not really the problem. The issue are the types and number of antennas located on the towers that emit EMF. With an increasing adoption of wireless technology, carriers seek to establish towers and antennas wherever possible to increase coverage as this becomes more lucrative when leasing space on towers to communication service providers. However, ongoing research indicates that the widespread adoption and expansion of wireless technology comes with health consequences.

​

Types of EMF Towers

​

Tower companies lease vertical space on towers for companies to install equipment and provide broadcasting or communications services to areas and communities. This vertical space can also be used for climate science, aeronautic navigation systems, or military surveillance systems. EMF towers all have distinct characteristics, outlined below.

​

  1. Monopole towers are single pole structures with a minimal design to reduce visual impact. They’re often used as communication towers for wireless communication, CCTV, TV and radio broadcasting [9] [10].

  2. Lattice towers are the largest towers, with a solid triangular or square base, allowing for installation of more antennas. They are used in a variety of ways, including for electricity transmission (power lines), cell and radio, radar, telecommunications, utilities, and in the military, aeronautic, meteorology, rescue or surveillance sectors [9] [11] [12].

  3. Guyed towers are the tallest structures, reaching up to several hundred meters high and anchored by guy wires. They are commonly used to install cellular antennas, microwave dishes, TV and radio antennas, meteorological instruments as well as equipment for aviation, military, rescue, and surveillance systems [9] [13].

  4. Stealth towers are monopole structures built in disguise. They are more commonly found in urban areas or in places where telecommunications companies wish to hide unattractive aspects of conventional towers. They can appear as trees (e.g. broad leaf tree, pine tree, and palm tree stealth towers), water towers, light poles, flagpoles and, last but not least, billboards. These towers are mostly used for smaller antennas such as wireless mobile telecommunications antennas [9] [14].

  5. Genuine water towers (in contrast to water tower stealth towers) can also serve as EMF towers. They are used for wireless communications antennas and are a good way for companies to utilize existing structures to expand coverage at low cost [9].

  6. Small cell poles include small lighting or utility poles on which a cell site is installed and connected by fiber optic cable. These accessible structures allow fast and abundant data transmission for internet and phone services [9].

How They Affect You

“The thesis that mobile communication is absolutely safe is both premature and potentially dangerous. The mobile phone is not a toy, it requires care and it is important to be well-informed.” [24]

​

Despite what can be read in health and medical headlines regarding unproven biological effects of non-ionizing radiation, in actuality the research is substantial and compelling. The belief that most current safety standards are sufficient to maintain the precautionary principle is flawed. Most safety standards are based on studies that have reported thermal effects and illnesses caused almost exclusively by acute exposure. Though more research is required to further understand how non-thermal effects occur, it is clear that these effects exist and that they are a health concern for people, animals, plants, and entire ecosystems everywhere on earth.

​

The BioInitiative Report provides data concerning exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation [15]. The table of contents offers a non-exhaustive list of some EMF effects to be wary of:

​

  1. Gene and protein expression

  2. Genotoxic effects – RFR and ELF DNA damage

  3. Stress response (stress proteins)

  4. Immune function

  5. Neurology and Behavior

  6. Blood-brain barrier

  7. Brain tumors and acoustic neuromas

  8. Childhood cancers (leukemia)

  9. Breast cancer

  10. Modulating signal disruption 

  11. Plausible genetic and metabolic mechanisms for bioeffects of very weak ELF magnetic fields on living tissues

  12. Fertility and reproduction

  13. Fetal and neonatal 

  14. Autism​​​​

​

The Americans for Responsible Technology website lists hundreds of research studies about additional health concerns [17]:

​

  1. Effects on Fetuses

  2. Effects on Children and Adolescents

  3. Brain Tumors

  4. Parotid Gland Tumors

  5. Other Malignancies

  6. DNA Damage and Gene Expression Changes

  7. Neurological / Cognitive Effects

  8. Cardiovasdcular Effects

  9. Male Fertility

  10. Electromagnetic Sensitivity

  11. Implanted Medical Devices

  12. 5G Effects

  13. Wildlife and Plants

  14. Reports, Articles and Reviews

​

Another big body of research has been congregated and published by the Naval Medical Research Institute [18] [19]. The report gathers and categorizes key research on the biological and clinical effects of microwave and radiofrequency radiation. The list of effects are classified within the following categories:

​

  1. Heating of Organs (Thermal effects)

  2. Changes in Physiologic Function

  3. Central Nervous System

  4. Autonomic Nervous System Effects

  5. Peripheral Nervous System Effects – Effects on Locomotor Nerves

  6. Psychological Disorders / Psychophysiologic Responses

  7. Behavioral Changes (Animal Studies)

  8. Blood Disorders

  9. Vascular Disorders

  10. Enzyme and Other Biochemical Changes

  11. Metabolic Disorders

  12. Gastro-Intestinal Disorders

  13. Endocrine Gland Changes

  14. Histological Changes

  15. Genetic and Chromosomal Changes

  16. Pearl Chain Effect

  17. Miscellaneous Effects

​

Some “common” symptoms people experience during acute and/or chronic exposure to EMFs can include:
 

  1. Disrupted memory, attention, learning, or cognitive abilities

  2. Mood changes, including increased irritability or anxiety

  3. Sleep disturbances

  4. Increased sensitivity to stress

  5. Dizziness, nausea, or fatigue

  6. Migraines or headaches

  7. Ringing in ears

  8. Nausea

  9. Skin burning

  10. Heart palpitations

  11. Fertility issues

 

Some people experiencing symptoms related to EMF exposure also have a health condition called Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS). We recommend consulting a health professional if you also experience symptoms from exposure to other environmental pollutants, such as exhaust fumes, pesticides, perfumes.

​

Living Near an EMF Tower

​

EMF radiation symptoms can be experienced by people living close to antennas. However, epidemiological studies aiming to evaluate (mostly) cancer incidence in human populations living near EMF towers are overall misleading, with weak conclusions. There are many variables yet to be accounted for, such as impact of distance to an EMF tower, type of signal and radiation, exposure time, intensity of exposure, and thickness of walls and other protection in living spaces.

 

Some of this lack of evidence is because many of the studies examining effects on animals or cells are done in controlled environments (laboratories) and the results cannot be reproduced on larger scales in human populations and in cities. Many more variables exist in real world exposures, and this makes the task of identifying the degree of influence of each variable on human health that much more challenging. It is clear though, based on lab testing, that EMF exposure alters the behavior of mice, interferes with a birds’ capacity to navigate, causes behavioral changes and mortality in bees, and produces ill health and abnormalities in reptiles, bacteria and plants.

How To Protect Yourself

The idea that EMF can affect biological organisms negatively is not new and has been the subject of research for decades. And though it is harder to show negative effects in large scale human experiments, this still begs the questions: Why is there not more concern from health officials? Why are more funds not allocated to studying risks related to EMF exposure in humans? Why are we still being told that EMF is safe and does not pose any health risks? And finally, why does it seem that corporations keep steam rolling out new technologies and outrageous amounts of antennas in the environment (ground and sky) year after year?

 

Non-thermal effects of low-intensity non-ionizing radiation occur at levels much lower than current safety standards. This radiation may cause more diverse conditions and effects not limited to cancer. The call for more research is loud and clear. The need to adapt safety standards until more research is done is also a top priority [18] [23 - 27]. 

 

While the expansion of wireless technology becomes greater, there are only so many ways we can limit exposure to EMFs.

 

Limiting your Exposure

 

Generally speaking, distance is your friend. Create as much space as possible between yourself and your devices, and EMF towers. Avoid excessive use of all mobile and wireless devices, as they are connected to the antennas. It is especially important to turn off WIFI in your home at night and keep your sleeping space free of all connected electronic devices. As mentioned at the beginning of this article, you can refer to our full article on EMF here, for more in-depth recommendations about protecting yourself from EMF. 

 

Use protective EMF shielding garments and products

 

Another way to limit exposure to EMF radiation is by using EMF shielding fabrics. These fabrics are woven with insulated metallic threads and sewn into a variety of products, from protective clothing to bed canopies, curtains, and sleeping bags. Some brands provide their own studies and this subject is deserving of further exploration. 

 

Additional EMF products include window films and shielding paint. Some interesting EMF harmonizing devices can also be found on the market.

 

Consult Professionals

 

If you’re concerned about the negative health effects of EMF exposure, work with professionals to thoroughly assess the exposure and then implement a plan to reduce that exposure.

 

  1. Contact a Naturopath or health expert who will work with you to improve your body’s tolerance to EMFs.

  2. Hire a professional to evaluate the level of radiation you’re exposed to in and around your home. This phase is crucial as it gives a clear idea of the zones most permeable to EMF radiation (wireless hotspots) within your living space. Simple steps like moving your bed away from the window could reduce your exposure quite rapidly. 

  3. Contact organizations or groups that are sensitive to this issue and connected to local resources for protecting yourself from EMF exposure. Having a trustworthy community to assist with the process is important in dealing with a daunting subject like this one.

  4. Depending on your situation, you may even want to move and find a new home.

Work with a naturopathic doctor / naturopath to help you assess for environmental pollutants and to understand how they may be affecting your health. The information on this website is a guide for ways to protect you and your family from environmental pollutants.  It is not meant to replace advice from a healthcare professional.

3 Essentials

  1. Limit your exposure as much as possible.

  2. Turn off WIFI in your home at night.

  3. Educate yourself and others around potential health effects of EMF radiation.

Additional Key Recommendations

  1. Keep your sleeping space free of electronic devices.

  2. Work with a naturopath or health professional trained in environmental toxins to improve your tolerance of EMFs.

  3. Work with a professional to evaluate your actual exposure and to provide you with strategies to decrease your exposure.

  4. Advocate for awareness and change.

  5. Contact local legislative groups or your city council.

  6. Consider moving to an area with less exposure.

References

  1. HOME/WORK EMF | ET. ET. Published 2016. https://www.wnf-environmental.org/homeworkemf

  2. NASA. Electromagnetic Spectrum - Introduction. Nasa.gov. Published March 2013. https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/toolbox/emspectrum1.html

  3. Metric Prefixes. Unl.edu. https://astro.unl.edu/classaction/tables/intro/si_prefixes.html

  4. UCAR. Visible Light | UCAR Center for Science Education. scied.ucar.edu. https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/atmosphere/visible-light

  5. Nasa. Visible Light | Science Mission Directorate. nasa.gov. https://science.nasa.gov/ems/09_visiblelight

  6. Radiation. www.who.int. https://www.who.int/health-topics/radiation - tab=tab_2

  7. Radiation. www.who.int. https://www.who.int/health-topics/radiation - tab=tab_3

  8. https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/2003-allochrt.pdf

  9. TYPES OF CELL TOWERS. Foresite Group. https://www.foresitegroup.net/post/types-of-cell-towers

  10. Monopole Towers | Fabrication and Installation. LARS Communications. https://www.lars.co.uk/towers-structures/monopole-towers/

  11. Lattice Towers - Fabrication and Installation | LARS Communications. LARS Communications. https://www.lars.co.uk/towers-and-structures/lattice-towers/

  12. Radar Towers | Fabrication and Installation - LARS Communications. LARS Communications. https://www.lars.co.uk/towers-and-structures/radar-towers/

  13. Tower KPIs - Visible Alpha. https://visiblealpha.com/telecommunications/tower-industry/tower-kpis/

  14. Group F. IT’S A TREE, IT’S A BARN, IT’S A…CELL TOWER? Foresite Group. Published August 6, 2014. https://www.foresitegroup.net/post/it-s-a-tree-it-s-a-barn-it-s-a-cell-tower

  15. bioadmin. Home. The BioInitiative Report. Published 2019. https://bioinitiative.org/

  16. bioadmin. BioInitiative Report 2012: Table of Contents. Published November 8, 2012. https://bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/

  17. SCIENTIFIC STUDIES | Americans for Responsible Technology. ART. https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/scientific-studies

  18. - NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE BIBLIOGRAPHY of REPORTED BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA (“EFFECTS”) and CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS ATTRIBUTED to MICROWAVE and RADIO-FREQUENCY RADIATION RESEARCH REPORT. https://zoryglaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BIBLIOGRAPHY-OF-REPORTED-BIOLOGICAL-PHENOMENA-EFFECTS-AND-CLINICAL-MANIFESTATIONS-ATTRIBUTED-TO-MICROWAVE-AND-RADIO-FREQUENCY-RADIATION-C.pdf

  19. Zorach R. Glaser, Ph.D. Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency Radiation. NMRI. Naval Medical Research Institute. Report No. 2 Revised https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0750271.pdf

  20. Dolk H, Elliott P, Shaddick G, Walls P, Thakrar B. Cancer Incidence near Radio and Television Transmitters in Great Britain II. All High Power Transmitters. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;145(1):10-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009026 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8982017

  21. Cooper D, Hemmings K, Saunders P. RE: “CANCER INCIDENCE NEAR RADIO AND TELEVISION TRANSMITTERS IN GREAT BRITAIN. I. SUTTON COLDFIELD TRANSMITTER; II. ALL HIGH POWER TRANSMITTERS.” American Journal of Epidemiology. 2001;153(2):202-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.2.202 https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/153/2/202/118459?redirectedFrom=fulltext

  22. Hocking B, Gordon IR, Grain HL, Hatfield GE. Cancer incidence and mortality and proximity to TV towers. Medical Journal of Australia. 1996;165(11-12):601-605. doi:https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb138661.x https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8985435

  23. Kenneth R. Foster. Upenn.edu. Published 2015. https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~kfoster/kfoster.htm

  24. Grigoriev Y. Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and EMF RF Standards. New Conditions of EMF RF Exposure and Guarantee of the Health to Population. https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/021235_grigoriev.pdf

  25. Russian National Committee of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection - 2008 Report. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/radiation/emf-international-project-country-reports/euro-region/russia-report-20089d95ee6c-798b-4dca-b40c-1d9440aacca5.pdf?sfvrsn=ffb0d3a0_3

  26. Lin JC. World Health Organization’s EMF Project’s Systemic Reviews on the Association Between RF Exposure and Health Effects Encounter Challenges [Health Matters]. IEEE Microwave Magazine. 2025;26(1):13-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/mmm.2024.3476748 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10795296

  27. Report-2009 of Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection for WHO EMF International Project. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/radiation/emf-international-project-country-reports/euro-region/russia_report_for_iac_2009.pdf?sfvrsn=4e67ef03_3

​

Additional papers and references consulted during the writing of this article:

​

  1. NASA. Visible Light - NASA Science. science.nasa.gov. Published August 10, 2016. https://science.nasa.gov/ems/09_visiblelight/

  2. UCAR. Visible Light | UCAR Center for Science Education. scied.ucar.edu. Published, 2018. 
    https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/atmosphere/visible-light

  3. OSHA. Non-Ionizing Radiation - Overview | Occupational Safety and Health Administration. www.osha.gov. https://www.osha.gov/non-ionizing-radiation - :~:text=Non-ionizing radiation includes the,, visible, and IR frequencies.

  4. A Need for Action Radiation and Cancer. https://www.healthandenvironment.org/docs/xaruploads/RadiationAndCancer2009.pdf

  5. EMFscientist.org - International EMF Scientist Appeal. emfscientist.org. https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal

  6. Agency (EPA) EP. Home - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). https://www.epa.ie/

  7. Reference List – Reported Biological Effects from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) at Low-Intensity Exposure Levels (Cell Tower, WI_FI, Wireless Laptop, Wireless Utility Meters “smart meters”) – Cindy Sage. MA, Sage Associates (November 22, 2012) https://bioinitiative.org/bibliography/

  8. RFR studies that used the Comet assay. Number of papers that showed effect / no effect https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/4-Table-1-RFR-Comet-Assay-Studies-2020-docx.pdf

  9. Static Field/ELF-EMF Comet Assay Studies https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/5-Table-2-Static-Field_ELF-EMF-Comet-Assay-Studies-2020.pdf

  10. Percent Comparison Showing Effect vs No Effect by Comet Assay Studies 2020 (September 1st, 2020) https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/10.-Comet-Assay-Studies-Percent-Comparison-2020.pdf

  11. RFR Free Radical (Oxidative Damage) Studies https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/RFR-Free-Radical-Oxidative-Damage-Abstracts-2022-1.pdf

  12. Percent Comparison in Free Radical Studies Showing Effect vs No Effect (May 2022) https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Free-Radical-Studies-Percent-Comparison-Graphic-2022.docx

  13. Literature on Genetic Effects of Non-Ionizing Radiation https://bioinitiative.org/genetic-effects-of-non-ionizing-emf-abstracts-2022/

  14. Percent Comparison in Genetic Studies Showing Effect vs No Effect https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Genetics-Effects-Studies-Percent-Comparison-Graphic-2022.docx

  15. Inquiry into the deployment, adoption and application of 5G in Australia – Submission 415 https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=cbfae8ab-9bd7-4960-8b2e-afccb58cfc8e&subId=672757

  16. Reported Biological Effects from Radiofrequency Radiation at Low-Intensity Exposure (Cell Tower, Wi-Fi, Wireless Laptop and “Smart” Meter RF Intensities https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/BioInitiativeReport-RF-Color-Charts.pdf

  17. Bortkiewicz A, Health effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF EMF), Editorial, Industrial Health 2019, 57, 403-405

  18. Conversion Chart EMR = EMF Power Equivalents---1 ΜW/Cm2 = 10,000 ΜW/M2 = 0.01 W/M2 * Low Concern-Building Biologists Benchmark ** BioinInitiative-No Observable Effect on Humans *** Extreme Concern for Long Term Exposure-Building Biologists Benchmark ΜW/M 2 = Yellow Highlights Are Current Limits in U.S. https://mdsafetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/conversion-chart-microwave-electromagnetic-radiation-pdf.pdf

  19. Electrohypersensitivity Abstracts (December 14, 2017) https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Electrohypersensitivity-50pg-2017.docx

  20. Static Field and ELF-EMF Free Radical (Oxidative Damage) Effects https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ELF-EMF-Static-Field-Free-Radical-Oxidative-Damage-Abstracts-2022.pdf

  21. Literature on Neurological Effects of Static and Extremely-low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (2007-2022) https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ELF-EMF-Static-Field-Neurological-Effects-Abstracts-2022.pdf

  22. Percent Comparison in Neurological Studies Showing Effect vs No Effect (May 2022) https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Neurologica1-Effects-Studies-Percent-Comparison-Graphic-2022-2.docx

  23. Sage C, Evans N. SOURCES of EMF EXPOSURE and HOW to AVOID THEM EMF Environmental Health Initiative. https://www.healthandenvironment.org/docs/xaruploads/EMFSourcesAndChoices.pdf

  24. :: International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety :: Icems.eu. Published 2021. https://www.icems.eu/other_res.htm

  25. Vini G. Khurana, Lennart Hardell, Joris Everaert, Alicja Bortkiewicz, Michael Carlberg & Mikko Ahonen (2010) Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 16:3, 263-267

  26. Freiburger Appeal, Published October 9th 2002 https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/

  27. A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation.; 1987. https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/backissues/m-j87issue.pdf

  28. Microwaves – A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation (1987), Vol. VII, No 6 https://zoryglaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MICROWAVE-NEWS-A-REPORT-ON-NON-IONIZING-RADIATION-VOL-VII-NO-6.pdf

  29. "IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz," in IEEE Std C95.1-2019 (Revision of IEEE Std C95.1-2005/ Incorporates IEEE Std C95.1-2019/Cor 1-2019) , vol., no., pp.1-312, 4 Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8859679. 

  30. Summary of a Problem.; 1992. https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/microwaves_2011.pdf

  31. Reports. Collaborative for Health & Environment. Published 2016. https://www.healthandenvironment.org/our-work/publications/reports

  32. Firstenberg A. Radio Wave Packet What You Need to Know about Wireless Technology.; 2001. https://cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Radio-Wave-Packet.pdf

  33. edson. RFR12-14-researchSummary. Scribd. Published 2017. https://www.scribd.com/document/728039914/RFR12-14-researchSummary

  34. Sage C, The Implications of non-linear biological oscillations on human electrophysiology for electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) (2015), Rev Environ Health, DOI 10.1515/reveh-2015-0007

  35. R. Santini, P. Santini, P. Le Ruz, M. Danze, M. Seigne, Survey Study of People Living in the Vicinty of Cellular Phone Base Stations, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 41-49, 2003

  36. Mobile Phone Towers. EMR Australia. https://emraustralia.com.au/pages/mobile-phone-towers

  37. Inquiry into the deployment, adoption and application of 5G in Australia, Submission 339 https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=2a1e3c29-afce-4a7a-8cea-e8a3fb740cf0&subId=673759

  38. Szmigielski S. Cancer morbidity in subjects occupationally exposed to high frequency (radiofrequency and microwave) electromagnetic radiation. Science of The Total Environment. 1996;180(1):9-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04915-0 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0048969795049150

  39. The Venice Resolution Initiated by the International Commission for Electromagnetic. https://www.icems.eu/docs/Venice_Resolution_0608.pdf

Committee Members

Dr. Moira Fitzpatrick, ND (USA), Chair

Dr. Iva Lloyd, ND (Canada)

Merciful Ananda (USA)

Dr. David Lescheid, ND (Germany)

Pedi Mirdamadi (USA)
Charity Thiessen (Canada)
Dr. Dwan Vilcins, Environmental Epidemiologist & Naturopath (Australia)

bottom of page